About the supermajority, regardless of this discussion, as I said I feel it is not fair (obviously no question about well intentioned).
You can’t have 4 GMs blocking 12 GMs.
Anyway thing Is settled.
As a correction, a 12-4 vote would be approved, not blocked. And 12-4 is far from the vote split here.
While I appreciate your perspective on majority vs supermajority, it is not really the main obstacle to U21 roster expansion as currently, the vote is 4 in favor and 7 against. Xavi is busy on Spring Break but the last time he voted, his vote was also against, which would give no the majority unless he’s changed his mind. So, IMO unless GMs changed their minds in favor, the topic of U21 roster expansion would die on the vine with less than 50% support.
I agree it’s not the main problem, but I’m really talking about general rules going foward. No rule is going to be changed if a majority of 3/4 is asked.
Again, as I said, the U21 thing is settled. I disagree with some of the arguments, but I don’t feel like engaging in something that is not supported by many.
But the rule change of 3/4 seems completely weird to me. Why should the MAJORITY suffer the decision of the minority? Even a VAST majority.
Seems completely astouding to me.
